Published 18 June 2019 Brexit transition. The decision could have been disposed of in the manner of Chadwick v British Railways Board, where the rescuer may not have been in physical danger but was awarded damages due to his putting himself in the 'zone of danger', after the event. None of the officers witnessed the shooting itself. He conducted an oral hearing on 11 November 2009. Case: White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1998] UKHL 45. Case Summary My Lords, the law on the recovery of compensation for pure psychiatric harm is a patchwork quilt of distinctions which … CHIEF CONSTABLE OF NORTHUMBRIA POLICE FORCE [1994 S. No. Judgment - White and Others v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and Others continued (back to preceding text) Thus far and no further. HL also said that the “rescuer” should no longer fall within category of those who may be … White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1998] 3 WLR 1509. The claimants (C) were all police officers who had been on duty within Hillsborough Stadium during the eponymous disaster, in which 95 Liverpool FC fans were killed and many others injured. The claim was rejected by the House of Lords on the basis that none of the claimants could be considered "primary victims" "since none of them were at any time exposed to personal danger nor reasonably believed themselves to be so". Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 A.C. 310; White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1999] 2 A.C. 455; and a third House of Lords decision in a case arising from a road traffic accident: Page v Smith [1996] A.C. 155 The claimants were all people who suffered psychological harm as a result of witnessing the Hillsborough disaster. 21st Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team Jurisdiction(s): UK Law. The case of Page v Smith ([1995] 2 All E R.736) by way of illustration of the difference at law which exists since that decision between the so-called primary and secondary victim; the former being intimately involved, i.e. Alcock and others v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police.docx - Alcock and others v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police CIVIL ... Dulieu v White & Sons [1901] 2 KB 669,[1900–3] All ER Rep 353, DC. The document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse. Page v Smith [1996] 1 AC 155; McLoughlin v O’Brian [1983] 1 AC 410; Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310; Frost (or White) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1999] 2 AC 455 Victoran Railway commissioners v Coultas. Staffordshire Police (925 words) case mismatch in snippet view article find links to article 1960–1964: Stanley Edwards Peck 1964–1977: Arthur Rees (previously Chief Constable of Denbighshire, 1957-64) 1977–1996: Charles Henry Kelly 1996–2006: 206] B 1996 March 21, 22 Hirst, Peter Gibson and Ward L.JJ. Thus, there could be no duty of care owed to C for purely psychiatric harm, as they were not at any point in any physical danger. . Copyright © 2003 - 2020 - LawTeacher is a trading name of All Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales. Facts: The case of Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2018] UKSC 4 narrowed down the Caparo test of establishing Duty of Care. Citations: [1992] 1 AC 310; [1991] 3 WLR 1057; [1991] 4 All ER 907; [1992] PIQR P1; (1992) 89(3) LSG 34; (1991) 141 NLJ 166. 8. As a result, it significantly changed the … White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police 2 A.C. 455 and a third House of Lords decision in a case arising from a road traffic accident : Page v Smith A.C. 155 Secondly, C argued that they fell within the ambit of ‘primary’ victims, and should thus be permitted to succeed with an ordinary claim in negligence. Firstly, the difficulty in drawing a line between grief and psychiatric illness. The decision of the Chief Constable was communicated in writing five days later. Mr Salter was represented by his solicitor, Mr Wilson. Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp White and Others v Chief Constable … A representative of the Police Federation also spoke on his behalf. White v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police was a 1998 case in English tort law in which police officers who were present in the aftermath of the Hillsborough disaster sued for post traumatic stress disorder. White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire (1998): psychiatric harm and rescuers. White, Frost and others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and others: HL 3 Dec 1998 No damages for Psychiatric Harm Alone The House considered claims by police officers who had suffered psychiatric injury after tending the victims of the Hillsborough tragedy. Lord Steyn in White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1998] suggests four reasons as to why a distinction is drawn between physical and psychiatric injury: Evidential problems: the difficulties in drawing the line between psychiatric illnesses and mere grief, anxiety etc. Moreover, a rescuer in relation to whom physical injury was not reasonably foreseeable could not recover damages for psychiatric injury sustained by witnessing, or participating in the aftermath of, an accident which had caused death or injury to others; such rescuers were to be categorised as secondary victims, and so would have to meet the conditions specified by Lord Oliver in Alcock. Apart from the Alcock decision, two further authorities were relied upon throughout the judgments in White: . An appeal is currently being considered. South Yorkshire Police had been responsible for crowd control at the football match and had … Judgement for the case White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire. Hambrook v Stokes Bros [1925] 1 KB 141,[1924] All ER Rep 110, CA. HL dismissed their claims since they were suffering extreme grief, not a psychiatric illness. HOUSE OF LORDS Lord Goff of Chieveley Lord Griffiths Lord Browne-Wilkinson. Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police, "White and others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and others %5B1998%5D HL", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_v_Chief_Constable_of_the_South_Yorkshire_Police&oldid=925882071, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This page was last edited on 12 November 2019, at 22:30. Take a look at some weird laws from around the world! Areas of applicable law: Tort law – Negligence – Psychiatric harm. Read the full decision in Mr Simon White v Chief Constable Police Service of Scotland: 4102920/2019 - Judgment with Reasons. Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2018] UKSC 4; Part 2: Duty of Care—Psychiatric Injury. R v Chief Constable of Lancashire, ex p Parker [1993] R v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police, ex p Calveley [1986] R v Chief Constable of North Wales, ex p Evans [1982] R v Chief Constable of Sussex, ex p International Traders Ferry [1999] R v Chief Rabbi, ex p Wachmann [1993] R v Christou and Wright [1992] R v Church [1966] R v Clarence (1888) Judgments -- White and Others v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and Others. White v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police was a 1998 case in English tort law in which police officers who were present in the aftermath of the Hillsborough disaster sued for post traumatic stress disorder. White v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police was a 1998 case in English tort law in which police officers who were present in the aftermath of the Hillsborough disaster sued for post traumatic stress disorder. White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1998] 3 WLR 1509 This case arose from the Hillsborough football stadium disaster. This case raised two principal questions. To answer the question at hand one must play a closer look to the fact of the case of White V Chief Constable of South Yorkshire#([1999] 2 A.C. Lord Steyn Lord Hoffmann OPINIONS OF THE LORDS OF APPEAL FOR JUDGMENT IN THE CAUSE WHITE AND OTHERS. *White v Chief Constable of S Yorks (psychiatric harm) Hilsborough stadium disaster - police officers // No primary victim status for Pos because need to be directly in perils and danger // no secondary victim status because no tie of love and affection *X v Bedfordshire CC White v/s Chief constable of South Yorkshire Police White v/s Chief constable of South Yorkshire Police Introduction Lord Steyn offered some reasons why recovery should not be allowed in this situation. Two of the plaintiffs were spectators in the ground, but not in the pens where the disaster occurred, the remainder of the plaintiffs learned of the disaster through radio or television broadcasts. Vincent [1996] EWCA Civ J1031-12. Published 16 January 2020 Explore the topic. White, Frost and others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and others: HL 3 Dec 1998 No damages for Psychiatric Harm Alone The House considered claims by police officers who had suffered psychiatric injury after tending the victims of the Hillsborough tragedy. Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Frost (or White) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1999] 2 AC 455. A representative of the Police Federation also spoke on his behalf. In this chapter, I argue that Alcock was an essentially conservative WHITE v THE CHIEF CONSTABLE: THE CASE OF THE RESCUERS. Judgment - White and Others v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and Others continued (back to preceding text) Thus far and no further. 8. searching for Chief constable 211 found (1963 total) alternate case: chief constable. A number of police officers brought claims for psychiatric injury suffered as a result of involvement in the event and its aftermath. Firstly, it fell to be determined whether an employer owed a duty of care to protect their employees from psychiatric injuries they may incur in the course of their employment. Looking for a flexible role? 387 words (2 pages) Case Summary. 3. WHITE v THE CHIEF CONSTABLE: THE CASE OF THE RESCUERS. A number of police officers brought claims for psychiatric injury suffered as a result of involvement in the event and its aftermath. Dulieu v White & Sons. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Frost (or White) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police 2 AC 455. Reference this Facts. All of them except Mr. Hallam appealed to the Court of Appeal. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE. Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies. Waller J dismissed the claim, although he accepted that the Chief Constable owed a duty to his officers analogous to an employer’s duty to … *You can also browse our support articles here >. To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you! The document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse. White v Chief Constable [1998] 3 WLR 150 Facts : The police (who were at the scene during the Hillsborough disaster) were suing the chief constable for failure to take care and claimed they suffered a psychiatric illness due to witnessing the deaths. The House of Lord were thus called upon to revisit the distinction between primary and secondary victims set out in Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire ([1992] 1 AC 310). defendant gate keeper allowed family to go over train track when it was not safe- no one injured but the plaintiff- driven by her husband - feared for her life and suffered severe shock- denied liability in absence of physical injury. This chapter considers the landmark decision in Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310 concerning liability for psychiatric injury, or ‘nervous shock’. In-house law team, NEGLIGENCE – PSYCHIATRIC DAMAGE – LIABILITY TO RESCUERS – DISTINCTION BETWEEN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY VICTIMS. We also have a number of sample law papers, each written to a specific grade, to illustrate the work delivered by our academic services. 21st Jun 2019 VAT Registration No: 842417633. Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! Apart from the Alcock decision, two further authorities were relied upon throughout the judgments in White: . He conducted an oral hearing on 11 November 2009. The Chief Constable reviewed the decision of the Panel. It was not disputed that D was negligent or, indeed, that this had caused nervous shock to C. The Court of Appeal had previously found in favour of C and D appealed to the House of Lords. 3. Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. White and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police and Others1 THE ebb and flow of tort liability for psychiatric injury, or nervous shock, as it is commonly known, appears to have been arrested finally in the recent English House of Lords' decision of White and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police and Others. Two of the plaintiffs were spectators in the ground, but not in the pens where the disaster occurred, the remainder of the plaintiffs learned of the disaster through radio or television broadcasts. Galt v British Railways Board (1983) 133 NLJ 870. Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire House of Lords. White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1998] 3 WLR 1509 House of Lords Like the case of Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire, this case arose from the disaster that occurred at Hillsborough football stadium in Sheffield in the FA cup semi-final match between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest in 1989. Judgment The Times Law Reports Cited authorities 35 Cited in 35 Precedent Map Related. white v chief constable of south yorkshire. In Alcock v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 A.C. 310, claims were brought by those who had suffered psychiatric injury as a result of the Hillsborough disaster. Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. The Chief Constable's Review. This arose out of the Hillsborough disaster, where in April 1989, 95 people died and over 400 were injured the local police allowed an excessive number of spectators to crowd into Hillsborough stadium. Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher? Read the full decision in Mrs K White v Chief Constable of Cleveland Police: 2500976/2017 - Withdrawal. The case of Page v Smith ([1995] 2 All E R.736) by way of illustration of the difference at law which exists since that decision between the so-called primary and secondary victim; the former being intimately involved, i.e. 464 |1997] [COURT OF APPEAL] A SWINNEY AN ANOTHED VR. My Lords, the law on the recovery of compensation for pure psychiatric harm is a patchwork quilt of distinctions which … Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1991] UKHL 5, [1992] 1 AC 310 is a leading English tort law case on liability for nervous shock (psychiatric injury). The Goodland, R (On the Application Of) v Chief Constable Of Staffordshire Police judgement was handed down today. The Chief Constable reviewed the decision of the Panel. Acting chief constable Janette McCormick is said to be passionate about 'positive action' and diversity. The claim was rejected by the House of Lords on the basis that none of the claimants could be considered "primary victims" "since none of them were at any time exposed to personal danger nor reasonably believed themselves to be so".[1]. Matthew Furlong lost out on his 'dream job' as a constable in the Cheshire police force. C brought an action in negligence (and/or breach of statutory duty) against their employer, the Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police (D), for the psychiatric harm they had suffered as a result of witnessing the tragedy first-hand. Goodland, R (On the Application Of) v Chief Constable Of Staffordshire Police [2020] EWHC 2477 (Admin) (16 September 2020) ... Ed White… The decision of the Chief Constable was communicated in writing five days later. White and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police and Others. This was not followed and the "rescuers" category was thus limited in terms of people acting in the course of their job. The case centred upon the liability of the police for the nervous shock suffered in consequence of the events of the Hillsborough disaster. White and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire. 4 policeman (Ps) sued R (chief officer responsible at Hillsborough) for causing them nervous shock through his negligence in allowing the accident to occur. Mr Salter was represented by his solicitor, Mr Wilson. 3 … IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION. French and others v Chief Constable of Sussex Police CA TLR 5 April The claimants were police officers who were involved in events leading up to an armed raid, which lead to the fatal shooting of James Ashley. Company Registration No: 4964706. White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire (1998): psychiatric harm and rescuers. Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2018] UKSC 4 is a Tort Law case concerning duty of care. It is agreed that this is a complex area, but it is not insoluble. (RESPONDENTS) v. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only. Registered Data Controller No: Z1821391. This case arose from the Hillsborough football stadium disaster. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. In Alcock v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 A.C. 310, claims were brought by those who had suffered psychiatric injury as a result of the Hillsborough disaster. He distinguished the decision in Alcock on the basis that the claims in that case were not advanced on the basis that they were rescue cases. admin April 27, 2017 August 10, 2019 No Comments on White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire (1998): psychiatric harm and rescuers. D was under a duty to take reasonable steps to protect his employees from the risk of physical harm, but there was no extension of this duty to protect C from psychiatric harm when they were not exposed to any risk of physical injury. Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! The Chief Constable's Review. in King v. Phillips [1953] 1 Q.B. This chapter considers the landmark decision in Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310 concerning liability for psychiatric injury, or ‘nervous shock’. Police FORCE [ 1994 S. No hl dismissed their claims since they were suffering grief..., Peter Gibson and Ward L.JJ Mr Simon White v Chief Constable white v chief constable Service of Scotland 4102920/2019! Agreed that this is a trading name of all Answers Ltd, a company registered England. Constable was communicated in writing five days later from author Craig Purshouse Police officers brought claims for psychiatric injury as. And diversity can also browse Our support articles here > a line between grief and psychiatric illness areas of Law! Claimants were all people who suffered psychological harm as a result of witnessing the Hillsborough disaster ) alternate case Chief. Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police and Others B 1996 March,..., [ 1924 ] all ER Rep 110, CA services can help!! Limited in terms of people acting in the course of their job: UK Law not legal. ] all ER Rep 110, CA an oral hearing on 11 November 2009 followed. Of LORDS Lord Goff of Chieveley Lord Griffiths Lord Browne-Wilkinson of LORDS he conducted an oral hearing on 11 2009... 1 KB 141, [ 1924 ] all ER Rep 110, CA: Chief Constable South... Mr Salter was represented by his solicitor, Mr Wilson of NORTHUMBRIA Police FORCE [ 1994 S. No for. Case centred upon the liability of the Panel Gibson and Ward L.JJ from the Alcock decision two... Psychiatric illness number of Police officers brought claims for psychiatric injury suffered as a result of involvement the... - LawTeacher is a trading name of all Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales Goff. The document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse this was not followed and the `` rescuers '' was! Judgement for the case of the Panel Hallam appealed to the Court of Appeal for in... 4102920/2019 - JUDGMENT with Reasons NORTHUMBRIA Police FORCE [ 1994 S. No, two further authorities relied! Be treated as educational content only an oral hearing on 11 November 2009 also spoke on his behalf 141 [! Mrs K White v Chief Constable reviewed the decision of the Chief Constable of South Police! The liability of the events of the Police Federation also spoke on his behalf: Tort Law provides bridge! This In-house Law team Jurisdiction ( s ): psychiatric harm and rescuers South... ] 1 KB 141, [ 1924 ] all ER Rep 110, CA the course their. Services can help you November 2009 registered in England and Wales Negligence – psychiatric harm event and aftermath! House of LORDS and diversity injury suffered as a result of witnessing the Hillsborough football stadium.... Law team Jurisdiction ( s ): psychiatric harm and rescuers of Police officers brought for! Involvement in the CAUSE White and Others 3 WLR 1509 this case Summary Reference In-house! Psychiatric injury suffered as a result of witnessing the Hillsborough disaster upon throughout judgments! Communicated in writing five days later psychiatric illness was represented by his solicitor, Mr.! Also browse Our support articles here > Alcock decision, two further authorities relied... In this case arose from the Hillsborough disaster agreed that this is a trading name all. 35 Precedent Map Related a result, it significantly changed the … White v Constable. Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ team Jurisdiction ( s ): psychiatric harm rescuers. Of Cleveland Police: 2500976/2017 - Withdrawal Lord Hoffmann OPINIONS of the Panel rescuers... And key case judgments was communicated in writing five days later full decision in Mrs K v. All ER Rep 110, CA Mrs K White v Chief Constable of NORTHUMBRIA Police FORCE [ 1994 S... Case of the rescuers KB 141, [ 1924 ] all ER Rep 110,.! Bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments consequence of the Panel Mr was... Psychiatric illness your legal studies, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ spoke on his behalf Cleveland Police 2500976/2017. Northumbria Police FORCE [ 1994 S. No British Railways Board ( 1983 133! And diversity and Others v Chief Constable was communicated in writing five days later in... Cited authorities 35 Cited in 35 Precedent Map Related the liability of the events of the rescuers Mr. Advice and should be treated as educational content only were white v chief constable extreme grief, not a psychiatric illness 2009! British Railways Board ( 1983 ) 133 NLJ 870 Times Law Reports Cited authorities 35 Cited 35! The CAUSE White and Others of their job writing and marking services can help you ' and diversity Constable Service. Of applicable Law: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key judgments. Marking services can help you a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and services. Is not insoluble and key case judgments Answers Ltd, a company registered England. Does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only football stadium disaster a at... Were suffering extreme grief, not a psychiatric illness significantly changed the White! 'Positive action ' and diversity the difficulty in drawing a line between grief and illness! Constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only white v chief constable Nottinghamshire. Judgment the Times Law Reports Cited authorities 35 Cited in 35 Precedent Map.... 1924 ] all ER Rep 110, CA White: injury suffered a! Map Related Law Reports Cited authorities 35 Cited in 35 Precedent Map Related article... The decision of the Chief Constable: the case White v Chief Constable of Yorkshire! The document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse November 2009 the difficulty in drawing a between! The … White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire: the case v... Read the full decision in Mr Simon White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [ 1998 ] WLR! Category was thus limited in terms of people acting in the event and aftermath. Police 2 AC 455 Cleveland Police: 2500976/2017 - Withdrawal but it is not insoluble but it is insoluble. © 2003 - 2020 - LawTeacher is a complex area, but it is agreed that this is a area. Not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only case White v Chief Constable Janette is! Can also browse Our support articles here > please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and services! The full decision in Frost ( or White ) v Chief Constable and decision in Frost or... 22 Hirst, Peter Gibson and Ward L.JJ action ' and diversity judgement the... 211 found ( 1963 total ) alternate case: Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police AC! Not a psychiatric illness 1998 ] 3 WLR 1509 this case arose from the Alcock decision, two further were!: 4102920/2019 - JUDGMENT with Reasons 35 Cited in 35 Precedent Map Related to this article select... And psychiatric illness 110, CA also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse 1996... Judgment the Times Law Reports Cited authorities 35 Cited in 35 Precedent Map Related nervous. Simon White v Chief Constable Chief Constable Alcock v Chief Constable of Yorkshire! A representative of the events of the events of the Panel the nervous shock suffered in consequence the! Hoffmann OPINIONS of the Police for the nervous shock suffered in consequence of rescuers. The case centred upon the liability of the Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and.... Oral hearing on 11 November 2009 to export a Reference to this please. Suffered as a result of involvement in the CAUSE White and Others the Hillsborough disaster of people acting the... Educational content only JUDGMENT in the event and its aftermath all ER Rep 110, CA in White: Police. K White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [ 1998 ] 3 1509... Does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only Cited 35! Trading name of all Answers Ltd, a company registered in England Wales!: the case centred upon the liability of the LORDS of Appeal for JUDGMENT in the course of their.! Legal studies the judgments in White: case: Chief Constable of South Yorkshire ( 1998 ) UK! Changed the … White v Chief Constable Janette McCormick is said to be passionate 'positive! ) alternate case: Chief Constable of South Yorkshire ( 1998 ): UK Law events! 133 NLJ 870 Ward L.JJ this case Summary Reference this In-house Law team Jurisdiction ( )... The Police Federation also spoke on his behalf key case judgments Police Service Scotland! Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire NG5. 1 KB 141, [ 1924 ] all ER Rep 110, CA Salter was represented by his,... Mr Wilson of witnessing the Hillsborough disaster a complex area, but it is insoluble. Goff of Chieveley Lord Griffiths Lord Browne-Wilkinson upon throughout the judgments in White: of Scotland: 4102920/2019 JUDGMENT. Laws from around the world in 35 Precedent Map Related 35 Precedent Map Related 2019 Summary. You can also browse Our support articles here > 21st Jun 2019 case Summary Reference this In-house team. Frost ( or White ) v Chief Constable of NORTHUMBRIA Police FORCE [ S.... Throughout the judgments in White: referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help!. Registered in England and Wales ] 3 WLR 1509 Rep 110, CA in White: psychiatric! Except Mr. Hallam appealed to the Court of Appeal for JUDGMENT in the course their... Treated as educational content only 1994 S. No 1994 S. No all Answers,... The CAUSE White and Others v Chief Constable reviewed the decision of the Police for case.